<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to square Winamp</title>
	<link>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/</link>
	<description>Ramblings of a restless mind</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-375</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-375</guid>
					<description>Yes, winamp is good, except for one thing.. it closes down everttime I put my laptop into standby (which I understand is a known bug), this is quite frustrating because thats a couple of times in the day - and each time I have to open it up again. If Itunes did not have such a big memory footprint it would kick the llama's ass. So for me I have moved to musikCube...and I like it! I also tried Foobar, but found it quite clumsy to use because you need to spend a bit of time configuring it etc and it does not have a small player (it is also designed for keyboard junkies which I am not as much as others i know)....This of course will prob cause all the Foobarians to shake violently..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, winamp is good, except for one thing.. it closes down everttime I put my laptop into standby (which I understand is a known bug), this is quite frustrating because thats a couple of times in the day - and each time I have to open it up again. If Itunes did not have such a big memory footprint it would kick the llama&#8217;s ass. So for me I have moved to musikCube&#8230;and I like it! I also tried Foobar, but found it quite clumsy to use because you need to spend a bit of time configuring it etc and it does not have a small player (it is also designed for keyboard junkies which I am not as much as others i know)&#8230;.This of course will prob cause all the Foobarians to shake violently..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AC</title>
		<link>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-129</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-129</guid>
					<description>I have man.. thing is that it does not offer the small conveniences that winamp does. 

For the tradeoff in memory footprint, I would still suggest Musikcube over Foobar.

Ultimately - it's personal choice :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have man.. thing is that it does not offer the small conveniences that winamp does. </p>
<p>For the tradeoff in memory footprint, I would still suggest Musikcube over Foobar.</p>
<p>Ultimately - it&#8217;s personal choice <img src='http://ramblings.loneroad.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-128</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-128</guid>
					<description>Have you tried Foobar 2000? 
http://www.foobar2000.org/download.html

Small footprint and can handle large playlists well :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Foobar 2000?<br />
<a href='http://www.foobar2000.org/download.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.foobar2000.org/download.html</a></p>
<p>Small footprint and can handle large playlists well <img src='http://ramblings.loneroad.info/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kapil kaisare</title>
		<link>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-127</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-127</guid>
					<description>Simplicity. Minimalism. Speed.

Need I say more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simplicity. Minimalism. Speed.</p>
<p>Need I say more?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anshul</title>
		<link>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-126</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ramblings.loneroad.info/2006/02/20/back-to-square-winamp/#comment-126</guid>
					<description>Master Kenobi, you disappoint me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Master Kenobi, you disappoint me!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

